Tag Archive for news

2012 Media Kaleidoscope

42 Vanderbilt corner web

From January’s perch I have decided to take a look back at 2012.  It was certainly a year of media, where companies struggled to find their footing in Web 3.0, where mobile became the buzz word and visual media–both videos and photos–proved there is no end to creativity or time to view everything from lovely photos on Pinterest to videos of every length and topic across the World Wide Web.

Google published its Zeitgeist, a list of lists of trending topics throughout the world. Google’s top ten images included mostly pop singers and the iPhone. I am not sure what that says about our collective tastes.

Over the weekend, newspapers from the New York Times (and online) to our local Journal News published their year in pictures as television stations ran their video montages we always called, “The Year Ender.”

I have my own year-ender rolling in my head. Beyond family, it is filled with images of political campaigns debated, won and lost, binders full of women, Big Bird and Elmo, Olympic athletes competing in London, wars raging in Iran and Afghanistan with more body bags coming home, the Mideast ablaze in rocket attacks, famine in Africa, a man with flaming red hair who opened fire in a crowded theater, and the most indelible of all for me were the images of the double-whammy close to home: Sandy and Sandy Hook. The most haunting, of course, remains the shooting rampage at a quiet little school in a nearby hamlet in CT where my children have friends and where it could have been Any Town USA.  Photos of children’s faces frozen in time and Christmas trees adorned with memories will linger. It was a year marked by a country galvanized politically and marked by violence where young soldiers and young children died in vain.

And how did the media handle it?  By looping photos and images over and over again. But did they need to? Images never leave us now. They are just a click away.

It’s hard to miss news or the images it provides.  If you didn’t see it on TV, there’s a clip in your Facebook newsfeed shared by a friend.  There’s an alert in your email about breaking news, or a Google alert on a topic you find interesting.

My colleague, Sean Womack at Touchstorm took stock after the presidential election of how the campaigns used video for better or for worse. He seemed to think they could have used it in a better way to convey the stories they wanted the world to see rather than those they didn’t (like Romney and the 47% debacle). As Sean says, with smartphone cameras, nothing is off the record ever. Here’s Sean’s take: The Camera is Always Rolling

Meanwhile, I look forward to the images of 2013. No presidential politics and, I hope, no pictures of tiny children lost to this world for no reason.

 

Hope & Heroes: Helping Kids with Cancer

Clare in her Kicking Cancer hat

Instead of me posting about this wonderful cause, I am reposting a blog written by my friend, The Mother Geek, Jeanne Garbarino, who is a  passionate scientist/communicator, a Metro-North commuter (that’s how we met) and working mom. She writes at Double X Science.

Good Deeds, Good Science: Hope & Heroes Children’s Cancer Fund

A few days ago, I received an email from my friend Helen Jonsen about a fundraising effort that is very near and dear to her heart.  Helen and her family are volunteering for the 3rd Annual Hope & Heroes Walk to show their support for the clinic that helped her own daughter, in her journey with cancer.  Taking place on April 29th, 2012 in Manhattan’s Clinton Cove Park, this fundraiser is to help ensure that the unique clinical care programs and cutting edge research funded by Hope & Heroes will continue.

Specifically associated with Columbia University’s Herbert Irving Child & Adolescent Oncology Center, Hope & Heroes boasts the ultimate NY start.  In 1997, Beth, a teenage Hodgkin’s Disease patient, decided to write the then NY Yankees first baseman, Tino Martinez.  Tino responded to Beth’s letter and invited her watch the Yankees during their spring training.  Tino and Beth “hit” it off, and their friendship inspired Tino to become more proactive in the lives of other young cancer patients by pledging a donation for every RBI he made.  The NY sports scene quickly caught wind of this, and a local sportswriter, Mike Lupica, dubbed this effort “Hope and Heroes.”

While the cancer center had been accepting donations for the purpose of supporting the innovative programs started by its director, Dr. Michael Weiner, the effort had finally been given a name.  But, it wasn’t until 2002 when Hope & Heroes filed for a 501(c)(3), giving this charity an official stamp.

According to Jeremy Shatan, the acting Executive Director of Hope & Heroes, the clinic sees about 100-150 new patients each year and about 5,000 – 7,000 total patient visits.  This number includes patients who are currently receiving treatment as well as those who have recovered but are still being monitored.

The money donated to Hope & Heroes Children’s Cancer Fund is used, in part, to finance many special programs that would otherwise be impossible.  Benefitting both the young patients and their families, these programs include the use of complementary medicine folded in to an often harsh regimen of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation.  In addition, Hope & Heroes also helps to provide emotional counseling to those in need, as well as allow these young cancer patients to participate in translational research studies, which opens the possibility for novel treatments.

The Hope & Heroes Children’s Cancer Fund has forged a permanent place in the hearts of many, including Helen and her family.  We at Double X Science find this effort to beyond a “good deed.”  Please show support for this organization by donating.  Because you never know when a kid will need it.

To donate to the 3rd Annual Hope & Heroes Walk, go here.

The Economy. Jobs. Housing. Help?

This is the final post I wrote at workingmother.com.

Jan. 25, 2012–It’s the day after President Obama’s State of the Union speech. The pundits had their say. The Republicans in Congress and the candidates have had theirs. And today the Federal Reserve chimed in acknowledging that theeconomy is expanding “moderately” and because of that interest rates will remain near zero through 2014. The use of the modifier “moderately” sounded like the most generous word the Fed could come up with. By pushing the date of possibly upping interest rates all the back to 2014 it signals the Fed thinks moderate growth is the best the economy will do for the next two years.

Just a reminder, the current recession began in 2008. (Yes, there’s that word “recession.”  Are we still in one or is this just the long tail of the recession that started with a major downturn which has not exactly ticked back up?)
Somehow, Wall Street was pleased that the interest rates are still low. But, Wall Street may have been just as happy if the Fed said rates were going up because the the economy is expanding grotesquely. Seems Wall Street makes money either way. Instead, the Fed tempered its remarks by reminding the world there is still “slowing in global growth,” the unemployment rate is still high, some household spending has expanded (I guess we can’t hold our breaths forever) but businesses are not spending.  So each little up seems to be tempered by an equal down.
If you are reading this at your desk, in bed or at your kitchen table, you may be rolling your eyes at the mention of the Federal Reserve Bank.  But when the Fed says it will keep interest rates near zero through 2014 be prepared to expect that our economy is not getting better anytime soon.  It just confirms what we already know. You can see it by looking around your neighborhood. How many of your neighbors are still on the job hunt or are under-employed, not doing what they are cut out to do, or not earning what they once earned?  Is your town, county or state laying off again, laying off the people who make your community: teachers and school staffs, uniformed professionals, service workers and others? Does one of them live in your house? Are “For Sale” signs still going up with very few coming down?
Readers on the Working Mother Facebook page were asked what they thought were the nation’s most pressing problems. The answers were: jobs, the economy, housing, along with with two other issues affected by the economy: health care and education. How could their answers be anything else?

Each one of us is trying to be responsible at home with our money but we wonder what the next month or year will bring when we see our incomes shrinking by the lack of raises or job prospects, our savings shriveling, our daily expenses continuing to rise because of higher costs of fuel, food, health care and imports. Everything touches the bottom line. Whether you are a new immigrant or a long-time resident, whether a young urban mom or an older sandwich generation mom or whether you are an executive at the top, you are touched somehow by this, someone you know is struggling as much or more than you are.
While the Fed statement was to offer stability by saying, in effect, “Don’t worry, money will be cheap for a year longer” it instead makes us wonder how we will hang on and keep our families and communities afloat.  And where is the next crisis lurking?

I watched Moyers & Company on PBS with clips from Congressional hearings where Amanda Gruebel, a 32-year-old working mom with a master’s degree, who is the school district family resource director for her town in Iowa testified last summer at a Senate hearing. She told how her family was struggling under the weight of school loans, a mortgage, salary cutbacks and cost of living going up. She also talked about others in her district. Her tale and theirs is all too familiar.

The Senate video clips were part of a larger Moyers’ report focusing on the book Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer — And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class.
The authors argue this current climate is 30 years in the making by Washington deal-making from the White House through the halls of Congress which has tilted the brass ring in one direction, away from the working middle class.  It was a fascinating discussion between commentator Bill Moyers, a self-described up-by-his-bootstraps journalist, and the two political scientists who wrote the book, Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson. They painted an ugly picture of a continuous series of Wall Street and government handshakes that changed how our country operates.
So are the cards stacked against us? Will the election of 2012 change our fortunes? Will one setback change how your family lives? What do you think?